Having responded rather aggressively in his first article (“Sobre unas declaraciones disidentes del pintor Alejandro Otero”), written in defense of tradition and against abstract art, the writer Miguel Otero Silva (1908–85) now returns with a far calmer, more reasoned discussion about his ideas on the subject. He once again deplores the irreverence of the painters who were members of the Los Disidentes group (Paris, 1950), describing it as a “previous story” that pre-dated his series of nine articles. The fact that the two men involved in the debate were cousins helped to set the tone of the far-reaching debate that was followed by interested readers in El Nacional, the Caracas newspaper. The debate between Miguel Otero Silva and Alejandro Otero Rodríguez was widely read and was reviewed in other countries (Colombia, Cuba, and Argentina). Its importance was underscored by the number of times it has been reprinted in Venezuela (1957, 1967, 1976, 1980, 1993, and 2001).
[For other articles by Miguel Otero Silva on this subject, see in the ICAA digital archive “II. Una división sin contenido plástico. Conceptos concretos sobre la pintura abstracta” (doc. no. 855992); “III. Aparición y desarrollo del abstraccionismo. Conceptos concretos sobre la pintura abstracta” (doc. no. 856012); “IV. Ubicación social del abstraccionismo. Conceptos concretos sobre la pintura abstracta” (doc. no. 856031); “V. Sobre el mundo interior de los abstraccionistas. Conceptos concretos sobre la pintura abstracta” (doc. no. 856050); “VI. El regreso a lo funcional y lo decorativo. Conceptos concretos sobre la pintura abstracta” (doc. no. 856069); “VII. Formas nuevas y sinceridad. Conceptos concretos sobre la pintura abstracta” (doc. no. 856923); and “VIII. Orientaciones de una nueva pintura. Conceptos concretos sobre la pintura abstracta.” (doc. no. 8569442)].
[It all begins with the first reply by Miguel Otero Silva to Alejandro Otero entitled “Sobre unas declaraciones disidentes del pintor Alejandro Otero Rodríguez” (doc. no. 813737)].