In this article, J. R. Guillent Pérez uses a philosophical reading to justify the reasons for his dispute with the Colombian critic originally from Argentina, Marta Traba (1930-83). This controversy began when she published the article, “El arte latinoamericano: un falso apocalipsis” [Latin American Art: a False Apocalypse] (“Papel Literario,” El Nacional, Caracas, May 2, 1965). Traba’s central point was her criticism of the Latin American artists who had adopted the postulates of the international avant-gardes. The debate went on for several months, more or less until September of the same year, and in addition to Traba and J. R. Guillent Pérez, the other main participants were the Venezuelan painters, Alejandro Otero, Roberto Guevara and Alirio Rodríguez. As justification, Guillent Pérez tells the story of how the group to which he belonged, Los Disidentes, came into being 15 years earlier. This group was formed by Venezuelan artists and writers who lived and worked as artists/writers in Paris between 1945 and 1952. From there, they proposed a struggle to renew traditional and academic art by assimilating the values of European Abstract art. The Venezuelan painters included: Alejandro Otero, Pascual Navarro, Mateo Manaure, Luis Guevara Moreno, Carlos González Bogen, Narciso Debourg, Perán Erminy, Rubén Núñez, Dora Hersen, Aimée Battistini, as well as Guillent Pérez, who was a young man studying philosophy at the time. They published five issues of a journal named after the group, Los Disidentes, which was their main medium of communications. Thus, Guillent Pérez found the source of his own arguments in the postulates of Los Disidentes and their struggle to respond to the crisis of Western culture. Faced with that crisis and wishing to assume leading roles as participants and critics, these Venezuelan artists had adopted the visual arts languages of the European avant-garde.