The critic, José Hernán Aguilar, reveals a confrontation in the Colombian art world, whose interests square off around the definition of “contemporary art,” using it as a warhorse. The writer asserts that “conservative” critics, artists and projects are using arguments that are incoherent and reactionary (“with clear commercial connotations”). Their purpose, he states, is to defend the supremacy of certain powerful figures on the national art scene. This being the case, “while the avant-garde (innovation) was good once upon a time, it is no longer any good.” Critics such as Marta Traba and Germán Rubiano are falling into terminological confusion when they deem “avant-garde” approaches that may well be innovative in terms of iconography but retain “their gilded frame (or bird breast).” On the other hand, Aguilar believes the art critic, Eduardo Serrano, represents a bright light who, casting his lot with any work he finds “experimental and young,” has become “the ambassador of the experimental, presenting the boldest platform.” In spite of the overall blandness of the artistic approaches (with a few exceptions), Aguilar credits the VII Salón Atenas [Seventh Athens Salon] with offering a testimony to the times through works by the following artists: Jaime Gómez, Mónica Negret, Julián Posada, Pedro Ramos, Patricia Restrepo, María Rueda, Rosemberg Sandoval and Fabiola Sequera.