After reviewing Orozco’s early work (drawings, prints, caricatures, and watercolors) and mentioning the influence of El Greco, Giotto, Goya, and Toulouse-Lautrec, Octavio Paz refers to a "hermetic or symbolic" trend to which the painter was exposed while he was in New York (even though Orozco had already painted his mural Omnisciencia[Omniscience] in 1925 at the Casa de los Azulejos [House of Tiles] in Mexico City, which already revealed a distinct symbolic and spiritual mood). Paz turns to the biographical work by the American journalist Alma Reed, in which she mentions Orozco’s contact with the Delphic movement, and the resulting philosophical, aesthetic, and political speculations that were best expressed in his frescos at Pomona College (1930) in California, and at the New School of Research (1930-–1931). This essay supports the contention that "mural painting is a complex, contradictory movement that refuses to be channeled in any single direction"; which is why the essay also contradicts the government’s assertion that "in the last thirty years, mural painting has been reduced to a lineal development of one single idea, one single aesthetic, and one single objective." Paz describes the presence of history in Orozco’s work as "a spin of the wheel of cosmic justice," where the soul is the counterpoint to the sterile movement of machines that are condemned to repeat themselves forever. His painting is a symbolic vision of the reality of the human race; his symbols are the legacy of tradition, though very liberally interpreted.