This article describes the characteristics of the works included in the exhibition Sexteto [Sextet] (Buenos Aires: Galería Lirolay, 1964) and reprints the artists’ opinions regarding the show’s classification as Pop art, a term that was used by this same magazine to describe the exhibition in a previous article (January 14, 1964). Beginning with these opinions and more importantly, the statements made by Rubén Santantonín and Pablo Mesejean, the article finds that the artists do not form a “cohesive” group with “common aspirations”; unless perhaps these are to “irritate the public with their disconcerting creations,” as well as agreeing with the notion that art “has no future only the present.” Finally [the article] also points out that as the representative of the Walker Art Institute (Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A), Jorge Romero Brest had already selected a great number of the works that composed the exhibition; these would be shown at the Walker as well as “five more United States museums.This article describes the characteristics of the works included in the exhibition Sexteto [Sextet] (Buenos Aires: Galería Lirolay, 1964) and reprints the artists’ opinions regarding the show’s classification as Pop art, a term that was used by this same magazine to describe the exhibition in a previous article (January 14, 1964). Beginning with these opinions and more importantly, the statements made by Rubén Santantonín and Pablo Mesejean, the article finds that the artists do not form a “cohesive” group with “common aspirations”; unless perhaps these are to “irritate the public with their disconcerting creations,” as well as agreeing with the notion that art “has no future only the present.” Finally [the article] also points out that as the representative of the Walker Art Institute (Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A), Jorge Romero Brest had already selected a great number of the works that composed the exhibition; these would be shown at the Walker as well as “five more United States museums.